← Back to Leaderboard
Project comparison
TradingAgents vs deer-flow
Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.
TradingAgents
TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Framework
Best matched with other agent tools.
94.1K
Stars
+20.2K
Weekly
67/100
Health
deer-flow
An open-source long-horizon SuperAgent harness that researches, codes, and creates. With the help of sandboxes, memories, tools, skill, subagents and message gateway, it handles different levels of tasks that could take minutes to hours.
Best matched with other agent tools.
77.6K
Stars
+10.7K
Weekly
95/100
Health
Quick Take
Adoption
TradingAgents has the larger GitHub footprint with 94.1K stars.
Momentum
TradingAgents is currently growing faster at +20.2K stars this week.
Maintenance
deer-flow has the stronger automated maintenance signal at 95/100. This is not a security or fit verdict.
Side-by-side evidence
Use these signals to narrow your choice, then confirm setup, license, and fit upstream.
| Signal | TradingAgents | deer-flow |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence status | Recently verified· 1d ago | Recently verified· 1d ago |
| GitHub stars | 94.1K | 77.6K |
| Weekly growth | +20.2K | +10.7K |
| Health score | Healthy67/100 |
Weekly AI open-source movers
Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.