Project comparison

Sandbase Harness vs open-design

Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.

Open-source CMA-compatible agent runtime for any model, with MCP tools, sandboxed sessions, audit, replay, and a local console. Includes a native DeepSeek Harness bundle over stdio MCP.

Best matched with other agent tools.

608

Stars

Weekly

50/100

Health

open-design

🎨 Best DeepSeek Harness Design Plugin. The open-source Claude Design alternative. 🖥️ Local-first desktop app. 🖼️ Your coding agent becomes the design engine: prototypes, landing pages, dashboards, slides, images & video — real files, HTML/PDF/PPTX/MP4 export. 🤖 Claude Code / Codex / Cursor / DeepSeek Harness / OpenCode & 20+ CLIs via BYOK.

Best matched with other agent tools.

94.6K

Stars

+43.2K

Weekly

95/100

Health

Quick Take

Adoption

open-design has the larger GitHub footprint with 94.6K stars.

Momentum

open-design is currently growing faster at +43.2K stars this week.

Maintenance

open-design has the stronger automated maintenance signal at 95/100. This is not a security or fit verdict.

Side-by-side evidence

Use these signals to narrow your choice, then confirm setup, license, and fit upstream.

Signal	Sandbase Harness	open-design
Evidence status	Basic listing· 7d ago	Recently verified· 11h ago
GitHub stars	608	94.6K
Weekly growth	0	+43.2K
Health score	Watch50/100

Weekly AI open-source movers

Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.