← Back to Leaderboard
Project comparison
Sandbase Harness vs deepseek-harness
Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.
Sandbase Harness
Open-source CMA-compatible agent runtime for any model, with MCP tools, sandboxed sessions, audit, replay, and a local console. Includes a native DeepSeek Harness bundle over stdio MCP.
Best matched with other agent tools.
608
Stars
0
Weekly
50/100
Health
214.7K
Stars
+50.8K
Weekly
82/100
Health
Quick Take
Adoption
deepseek-harness has the larger GitHub footprint with 214.7K stars.
Momentum
deepseek-harness is currently growing faster at +50.8K stars this week.
Maintenance
deepseek-harness has the stronger automated maintenance signal at 82/100. This is not a security or fit verdict.
Side-by-side evidence
Use these signals to narrow your choice, then confirm setup, license, and fit upstream.
| Signal | Sandbase Harness | deepseek-harness |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence status | Basic listing· 7d ago | Recently verified· 11h ago |
| GitHub stars | 608 | 214.7K |
| Weekly growth | 0 | +50.8K |
| Health score | Watch50/100 |
Weekly AI open-source movers
Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.