← Back to Leaderboard
Project comparison
Planning With Files vs Archify
Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.
Planning With Files
Persistent file-based planning for AI coding agents and long-running tasks. Crash-proof markdown plans, session recovery after /clear and compaction, per-turn re-injection against context rot, deterministic completion gate. Manus-style. Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Kiro, OpenCode and 60+ agents via the Agent Skills standard.
Best matched with other agent tools.
25.6K
Stars
+4.7K
Weekly
80/100
Health
Archify
Turn any idea, plan, or codebase into a beautiful interactive diagram. An agent skill for Claude Code, Codex, and more.
Best matched with other agent tools.
76.9K
Stars
0
Weekly
69/100
Health
Quick Take
Adoption
Archify has the larger GitHub footprint with 76.9K stars.
Momentum
Planning With Files is currently growing faster at +4.7K stars this week.
Maintenance
Planning With Files has the stronger automated maintenance signal at 80/100. This is not a security or fit verdict.
Side-by-side evidence
Use these signals to narrow your choice, then confirm setup, license, and fit upstream.
| Signal | Planning With Files | Archify |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence status | Needs recheck· 2026-09-07 09:36 UTC | Basic listing· 2026-10-04 09:17 UTC |
| GitHub stars | 25.6K | 76.9K |
| Weekly growth | +4.7K | 0 |
| Health score | Strong80/100 | Healthy69/100 |
| Contributors | 50 | 75 |
| Commits per week | 8.1 | 64.0 |
| Open issues | 5 | 199 |
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Last commit | 2026-07-21 21:29 UTC | 2026-10-04 08:57 UTC |
| Last release | v3.8.1 | v3.0.1 |
Weekly AI open-source movers
Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.