← Back to Leaderboard
Project comparison
Metaclaw vs TradingAgents
Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.
3.4K
Stars
0
Weekly
58/100
Health
TradingAgents
TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Framework
Best matched with other agent tools.
94.7K
Stars
+20.2K
Weekly
67/100
Health
Quick Take
Adoption
TradingAgents has the larger GitHub footprint with 94.7K stars.
Momentum
TradingAgents is currently growing faster at +20.2K stars this week.
Maintenance
TradingAgents has the stronger automated maintenance signal at 67/100. This is not a security or fit verdict.
Side-by-side evidence
Use these signals to narrow your choice, then confirm setup, license, and fit upstream.
| Signal | Metaclaw | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence status | Basic listing· 5d ago | Recently verified· 5d ago |
| GitHub stars | 3.4K | 94.7K |
| Weekly growth | 0 | +20.2K |
| Health score | Watch58/100 |
Weekly AI open-source movers
Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.