← Back to Leaderboard
Project comparison
Magic Context vs claude-mem
Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.
Magic Context
Unbounded context. Memory that manages itself. One session, for life. The hippocampus for coding agents, part of CortexKit.
Best matched with other agent tools.
1.6K
Stars
0
Weekly
66/100
Health
claude-mem
Persistent Context Across Sessions for Every Agent – Captures everything your agent does during sessions, compresses it with AI, and injects relevant context back into future sessions. Works with Claude Code, OpenClaw, Codex, Gemini, Hermes, Copilot, OpenCode + More
Best matched with other agent tools.
93.4K
Stars
+13.4K
Weekly
95/100
Health
Quick Take
Adoption
claude-mem has the larger GitHub footprint with 93.4K stars.
Momentum
claude-mem is currently growing faster at +13.4K stars this week.
Maintenance
claude-mem has the stronger automated maintenance signal at 95/100. This is not a security or fit verdict.
Side-by-side evidence
Use these signals to narrow your choice, then confirm setup, license, and fit upstream.
| Signal | Magic Context | claude-mem |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence status | Basic listing· 13h ago | Recently verified· 13h ago |
| GitHub stars | 1.6K | 93.4K |
| Weekly growth | 0 | +13.4K |
| Health score | Healthy66/100 |
Weekly AI open-source movers
Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.