← Back to Leaderboard
Project comparison
Machine Learning For Trading vs TradingAgents
Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.
Machine Learning For Trading
Code for Machine Learning for Trading, 3rd edition — from data sourcing to live execution.
Best matched with other agent tools.
20.0K
Stars
0
Weekly
44/100
Health
TradingAgents
TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Framework
Best matched with other agent tools.
94.1K
Stars
+20.2K
Weekly
67/100
Health
Quick Take
Adoption
TradingAgents has the larger GitHub footprint with 94.1K stars.
Momentum
TradingAgents is currently growing faster at +20.2K stars this week.
Maintenance
TradingAgents has the stronger automated maintenance signal at 67/100. This is not a security or fit verdict.
Side-by-side evidence
Use these signals to narrow your choice, then confirm setup, license, and fit upstream.
| Signal | Machine Learning For Trading | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence status | Basic listing· 14h ago | Recently verified· 12h ago |
| GitHub stars | 20.0K | 94.1K |
| Weekly growth | 0 | +20.2K |
| Health score | Watch44/100 |
Weekly AI open-source movers
Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.