← Back to Leaderboard
Project comparison
deepseek-harness vs open-design
Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.
214.7K
Stars
+50.8K
Weekly
82/100
Health
open-design
🎨 Best DeepSeek Harness Design Plugin. The open-source Claude Design alternative. 🖥️ Local-first desktop app. 🖼️ Your coding agent becomes the design engine: prototypes, landing pages, dashboards, slides, images & video — real files, HTML/PDF/PPTX/MP4 export. 🤖 Claude Code / Codex / Cursor / DeepSeek Harness / OpenCode & 20+ CLIs via BYOK.
Best matched with other agent tools.
94.6K
Stars
+43.2K
Weekly
95/100
Health
Quick Take
Adoption
deepseek-harness has the larger GitHub footprint with 214.7K stars.
Momentum
deepseek-harness is currently growing faster at +50.8K stars this week.
Maintenance
open-design has the stronger automated maintenance signal at 95/100. This is not a security or fit verdict.
Side-by-side evidence
Use these signals to narrow your choice, then confirm setup, license, and fit upstream.
| Signal | deepseek-harness | open-design |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence status | Recently verified· 11h ago | Recently verified· 11h ago |
| GitHub stars | 214.7K | 94.6K |
| Weekly growth | +50.8K | +43.2K |
| Health score | Strong82/100 |
Weekly AI open-source movers
Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.