← Back to Leaderboard
Project comparison
deepseek-harness vs firecrawl
Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.
214.7K
Stars
+50.8K
Weekly
82/100
Health
firecrawl
The context API to search, scrape, and interact with the web at scale. 🔥
Best matched with other agent tools.
177.4K
Stars
+36.0K
Weekly
82/100
Health
Quick Take
Adoption
deepseek-harness has the larger GitHub footprint with 214.7K stars.
Momentum
deepseek-harness is currently growing faster at +50.8K stars this week.
Maintenance
deepseek-harness has the stronger automated maintenance signal at 82/100. This is not a security or fit verdict.
Side-by-side evidence
Use these signals to narrow your choice, then confirm setup, license, and fit upstream.
| Signal | deepseek-harness | firecrawl |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence status | Recently verified· 10h ago | Recently verified· 10h ago |
| GitHub stars | 214.7K | 177.4K |
| Weekly growth | +50.8K | +36.0K |
| Health score | Strong82/100 |
Weekly AI open-source movers
Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.