← Back to Leaderboard
Project comparison
deepseek-harness vs claude-mem
Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.
214.7K
Stars
+50.8K
Weekly
82/100
Health
claude-mem
Persistent Context Across Sessions for Every Agent – Captures everything your agent does during sessions, compresses it with AI, and injects relevant context back into future sessions. Works with Claude Code, OpenClaw, Codex, Gemini, Hermes, Copilot, OpenCode + More
Best matched with other agent tools.
93.4K
Stars
+13.4K
Weekly
95/100
Health
Quick Take
Adoption
deepseek-harness has the larger GitHub footprint with 214.7K stars.
Momentum
deepseek-harness is currently growing faster at +50.8K stars this week.
Maintenance
claude-mem has the stronger automated maintenance signal at 95/100. This is not a security or fit verdict.
Side-by-side evidence
Use these signals to narrow your choice, then confirm setup, license, and fit upstream.
| Signal | deepseek-harness | claude-mem |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence status | Recently verified· 11h ago | Recently verified· 11h ago |
| GitHub stars | 214.7K | 93.4K |
| Weekly growth | +50.8K | +13.4K |
| Health score | Strong82/100 |
Weekly AI open-source movers
Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.