← Back to Leaderboard
Project comparison
Cua vs Tesseract
Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.
Cua
Open-source infrastructure for Computer-Use Agents. Sandboxes, SDKs, and benchmarks to train and evaluate AI agents that can control full desktops (macOS, Linux, Windows).
Best matched with other framework tools.
15.9K
Stars
0
Weekly
67/100
Health
75.5K
Stars
+1.5K
Weekly
69/100
Health
Quick Take
Adoption
Tesseract has the larger GitHub footprint with 75.5K stars.
Momentum
Tesseract is currently growing faster at +1.5K stars this week.
Maintenance
Tesseract has the stronger automated maintenance signal at 69/100. This is not a security or fit verdict.
Side-by-side evidence
Use these signals to narrow your choice, then confirm setup, license, and fit upstream.
| Signal | Cua | Tesseract |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence status | Basic listing· 2d ago | Basic listing· 2d ago |
| GitHub stars | 15.9K | 75.5K |
| Weekly growth | 0 | +1.5K |
| Health score | Healthy67/100 |
Weekly AI open-source movers
Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.