Project comparison

Codex Slides vs open-design

Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.

🎨 Open-source AI slide studio inside Codex: image-native decks, every slide a full visual canvas. ⚡ 10+ high-quality slides in ~4–5 minutes — Fast mode renders every page in parallel. 🔍 Watch the whole chain live: research → outline → style → render → edit → present → export PDF/PPTX. 🖥️ Browser-first · zero API keys · durable projects.

Best matched with other agent tools.

597

Stars

Weekly

39/100

Health

open-design

🎨 The open-source Claude Design alternative. 🖥️ Local-first desktop app. 🖼️ Your coding agent becomes the design engine: prototypes, landing pages, dashboards, slides, images & video — real files, HTML/PDF/PPTX/MP4 export. 🤖 Claude Code / Codex / Cursor / Gemini / OpenCode / Qwen & 20+ CLIs via BYOK.

Best matched with other agent tools.

81.8K

Stars

+43.2K

Weekly

100/100

Health

Quick Take

Adoption

open-design has the larger GitHub footprint with 81.8K stars.

Momentum

open-design is currently growing faster at +43.2K stars this week.

Maintenance

open-design has the stronger automated maintenance signal at 100/100. This is not a security or fit verdict.

Side-by-side evidence

Use these signals to narrow your choice, then confirm setup, license, and fit upstream.

Signal	Codex Slides	open-design
Evidence status	Basic listing· 5d ago	Recently verified· 5d ago
GitHub stars	597	81.8K
Weekly growth	0	+43.2K
Health score	Caution39/100

Weekly AI open-source movers

Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.