← Back to Leaderboard
Project comparison
Codebase Memory Mcp vs graphify
Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.
Codebase Memory Mcp
High-performance code intelligence MCP server. Indexes codebases into a persistent knowledge graph — average repo in milliseconds. 158 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens. Single static binary, zero dependencies.
Best matched with other framework tools.
34.1K
Stars
0
Weekly
70/100
Health
graphify
Turn any codebase, with its docs, SQL schemas, configs, and PDFs, into a queryable knowledge graph. A /graphify skill for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Gemini CLI: local deterministic AST parsing, every edge explained, no vector store.
Best matched with other framework tools.
93.8K
Stars
+47.0K
Weekly
100/100
Health
Quick Take
Adoption
graphify has the larger GitHub footprint with 93.8K stars.
Momentum
graphify is currently growing faster at +47.0K stars this week.
Maintenance
graphify has the stronger automated maintenance signal at 100/100. This is not a security or fit verdict.
Side-by-side evidence
Use these signals to narrow your choice, then confirm setup, license, and fit upstream.
| Signal | Codebase Memory Mcp | graphify |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence status | Basic listing· 11h ago | Recently verified· 9h ago |
| GitHub stars | 34.1K | 93.8K |
| Weekly growth | 0 | +47.0K |
| Health score | Healthy70/100 |
Weekly AI open-source movers
Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.