Project comparison

Awesome Codex Subagents vs open-design

Compare adoption, momentum, maintenance health, and project basics before choosing which tool to evaluate deeper.

Awesome Codex Subagents

A collection of 130+ specialized Codex subagents covering a wide range of development use cases.

Best matched with other agent tools.

4.6K

Stars

Weekly

36/100

Health

open-design

🎨 The open-source Claude Design alternative. 🖥️ Local-first desktop app. 🖼️ Your coding agent becomes the design engine: prototypes, landing pages, dashboards, slides, images & video — real files, HTML/PDF/PPTX/MP4 export. 🤖 Claude Code / Codex / Cursor / Gemini / OpenCode / Qwen & 20+ CLIs via BYOK.

Best matched with other agent tools.

81.8K

Stars

+43.2K

Weekly

100/100

Health

Quick Take

Adoption

open-design has the larger GitHub footprint with 81.8K stars.

Momentum

open-design is currently growing faster at +43.2K stars this week.

Maintenance

open-design has the stronger automated maintenance signal at 100/100. This is not a security or fit verdict.

Side-by-side evidence

Use these signals to narrow your choice, then confirm setup, license, and fit upstream.

Signal	Awesome Codex Subagents	open-design
Evidence status	Basic listing· 5d ago	Recently verified· 5d ago
GitHub stars	4.6K	81.8K
Weekly growth	0	+43.2K
Health score	Caution36/100

Weekly AI open-source movers

Get the fastest-growing projects, useful MCP servers, and technical reads in one weekly email.